<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberty-Finder &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberty-finder.com/category/politics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberty-finder.com</link>
	<description>Magnify Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Panarchism</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/panarchism</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/panarchism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 09:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panarchism is a political philosophy emphasizing each individual&#8217;s right to freely join and leave the jurisdiction of any governments they choose, without being forced to move from their current locale. The word &#8220;panarchy&#8221; was invented and the concept proposed by a Belgian political economist, Paul Émile de Puydt in an article called &#8220;Panarchy&#8221; published in 1860. The word &#8220;panarchy&#8221; has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Panarchism</strong> is a political philosophy emphasizing each individual&#8217;s right to freely join and leave the jurisdiction of any governments they choose, without being forced to move from their current locale. The word &#8220;panarchy&#8221; was invented and the concept proposed by a Belgian political economist, Paul Émile de Puydt in an article called &#8220;Panarchy&#8221; published in 1860. The word &#8220;panarchy&#8221; has since taken on additional, separate meanings, with the word &#8220;panarchism&#8221; referring to the original definition by de Puydt.</p>
<p>DePudyt, a proponent of laissez-faire economics, wrote that &#8220;governmental competition&#8221; would allow &#8220;as many regularly competing governments as have ever been conceived and will ever be invented&#8221; to exist simultaneously and detailed how such a system would be implemented. As David M. Hart writes: &#8220;Governments would become political churches, only having jurisdiction over their congregations who had elected to become members.&#8221; <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 05/03/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/panarchism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Founding Fathers of the United States</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/founding-fathers-of-the-united-states</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/founding-fathers-of-the-united-states#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Founding Fathers of the United States were the political leaders who signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776 or otherwise took part in the American Revolution in winning American independence from Great Britain, or who participated in framing and adopting the United States Constitution in 1787-1788, or in putting the new government under the Constitution into effect. Within the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Founding Fathers of the United States</strong> were the political leaders who signed the <a title="United States Declaration of Independence" href="http://liberty-finder.com/united-states-declaration-of-independence">Declaration of Independence</a> in 1776 or otherwise took part in the <a title="American Revolution" href="http://liberty-finder.com/american-revolution">American Revolution</a> in winning American independence from Great Britain, or who participated in framing and adopting the United States Constitution in 1787-1788, or in putting the new government under the Constitution into effect. Within the large group known as &#8220;the founding fathers,&#8221; there are two key subsets, the Signers (who signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776) and the Framers (who were delegates to the Federal Convention and took part in framing or drafting the proposed Constitution of the United States). Most historians define the &#8220;founding fathers&#8221; to mean a larger group, including not only the Signers and the Framers but also all those who, whether as politicians or jurists or statesmen or soldiers or diplomats or ordinary citizens, took part in winning American independence and creating the United States of America. The eminent American historian Richard B. Morris, in his 1973 book <em>Seven Who Shaped Our Destiny: The Founding Fathers as Revolutionaries,</em> identified the following seven figures as the key founding fathers: <a title="Benjamin Franklin" href="http://liberty-finder.com/benjamin-franklin">Benjamin Franklin</a>, <a title="George Washington" href="http://liberty-finder.com/george-washington">George Washington</a>, <a title="John Adams" href="http://liberty-finder.com/john-adams">John Adams</a>, <a title="Thomas Jefferson" href="http://liberty-finder.com/thomas-jefferson">Thomas Jefferson</a>, <a title="John Jay" href="http://liberty-finder.com/john-jay">John Jay</a>, <a title="James Madison" href="http://liberty-finder.com/james-madison">James Madison</a>, and <a title="Alexander Hamilton" href="http://liberty-finder.com/alexander-hamilton">Alexander Hamilton</a>. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 04/25/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/founding-fathers-of-the-united-states/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democracy</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/democracy</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/democracy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient Greece]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democracy is a political government carried out either directly by the people (direct democracy) or by means of elected representatives of the people (Representative democracy). The term is derived from the Greek: δημοκρατία - (dēmokratía) &#8220;rule of the people&#8221;, which was coined from δῆμος (dêmos) &#8220;people&#8221; and κράτος (krátos) &#8220;power&#8221;, in the middle of the fifth-fourth century BC to denote [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democracy</strong> is a political government carried out either directly by the people (direct democracy) or by means of elected representatives of the people (Representative democracy). The term is derived from the Greek: δημοκρατία - (<em>dēmokratía</em>) &#8220;rule of the people&#8221;, which was coined from δῆμος (<em>dêmos</em>) &#8220;people&#8221; and κράτος (<em>krátos</em>) &#8220;power&#8221;, in the middle of the fifth-fourth century BC to denote the political systems then existing in some Greek city-states, notably Athens following a popular uprising in 508 BC. Even though there is no specific, universally accepted definition of &#8216;democracy&#8217;, there are two principles that any definition of <strong>democracy</strong> includes: equality and <a href="http://liberty-finder.com/freedom">freedom</a>.<span style="font-size: small;"><span> </span></span>These principles are reflected in all citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to power and the freedom of its citizens is secured by legitimized rights and liberties which are generally protected by a constitution.</p>
<p>There are several varieties of democracy, some of which provide better representation and more freedoms for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not carefully legislated – through the use of balances – to avoid an uneven distribution of political power, such as the <a title="Separation of powers" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers">separation of powers</a>, then a branch of the system of rule could accumulate power and become harmful to the democracy itself. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 04/25/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/democracy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nation</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/nation</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/nation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nation is a grouping of people who share common history, culture, language and ethnic origin, often possessing or seeking its own government. The development and conceptualization of a nation is closely related to the development of modern industrial states and nationalist movements in Europe in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, although nationalists would trace nations into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <strong>nation</strong> is a grouping of people who share common history, culture, language and ethnic origin, often possessing or seeking its own government. The development and conceptualization of a nation is closely related to the development of modern industrial states and nationalist movements in Europe in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, although nationalists would trace nations into the past along uninterrupted lines of historical narrative. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 04/24/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/nation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliament</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/parliament</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/parliament#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A parliament is a legislature, especially in those countries whose system of government is based on the Westminster system modeled after that of the United Kingdom. The name is derived from the French parlement, the action of parler (to speak): a parlement is a discussion. The term came to mean a meeting at which such a discussion took place. It acquired its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <strong>parliament</strong> is a legislature, especially in those countries whose system of government is based on the Westminster system modeled after that of the United Kingdom. The name is derived from the French <em>parlement</em>, the action of <em>parler</em> (to speak): a <em>parlement</em> is a discussion. The term came to mean a meeting at which such a discussion took place. It acquired its modern meaning as it came to be used for the body of people (in an institutional sense) who would meet to discuss matters of state. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 04/23/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/parliament/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/socialism</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/socialism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illiberal Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Socialism is a political philosophy that encompasses various theories of economic organization which advocate either public or direct worker ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources. A more comprehensive definition of socialism is an economic system that directly maximizes use-values as opposed to exchange-values and has transcended commodity production and wage labor, along with a corresponding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Socialism</strong> is a political philosophy that encompasses various theories of economic organization which advocate either public or direct worker ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources. A more comprehensive definition of socialism is an economic system that directly maximizes use-values as opposed to exchange-values and has transcended commodity production and wage labor, along with a corresponding set of social and economic relations, including the organization of economic institutions and method of resource allocation; often implying a method of compensation based on individual merit, the amount of labor expended or individual contribution.</p>
<p>Socialists generally share the view that <a title="Capitalism" href="http://liberty-finder.com/capitalism">capitalism</a> unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls <a title="Capital (economics)" href="http://liberty-finder.com/capital">capital</a> and derives its wealth through a system of exploitation. This in turn creates an unequal society, that fails to provide equal opportunities for everyone to maximise their potential, and does not utilise technology and resources to their maximum potential nor in the interests of the public. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 04/23/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/socialism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Whig Party</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/british-whig-party</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/british-whig-party#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Whigs are often described as one of the two original political parties (the other being the Tories) in England and later the United Kingdom from the late 17th to the mid-19th centuries. The Whigs&#8217; origin lay in constitutional monarchism and opposition to absolute rule. Both parties began as loose groupings or tendencies, but became [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Whigs</strong> are often described as one of the two original political parties (the other being the Tories) in England and later the United Kingdom from the late 17th to the mid-19th  centuries. The Whigs&#8217; origin lay in <a title="Constitutional monarchism" href="http://liberty-finder.com/constitutional-monarchism">constitutional  monarchism</a> and opposition to absolute rule. Both parties began as  loose groupings or tendencies, but became quite formal by 1784, with the  ascension of Charles James Fox as the leader of a  reconstituted &#8220;Whig&#8221; party ranged against the governing party of the new  &#8220;Tories&#8221; under William Pitt the Younger.</p>
<p>The Whig party slowly evolved during the 18th century. The Whig  tendency supported the great  aristocratic families, the Protestant Hanoverian succession and  toleration for nonconformist Protestants (the &#8220;dissenters,&#8221; such as Presbyterians), while the Tories  supported the exiled Stuart royal family&#8217;s claims for the throne (Jacobitism),  the established Church of England and the gentry.  Later on, the Whigs drew support from the emerging industrial interests  and wealthy merchants, while the Tories drew support from the landed  interests and the British Crown. The Whigs were  originally also known as the &#8220;Country Party&#8221; (as opposed to the Tories,  the &#8220;Court Party&#8221;). By the first half of the 19th century, however, the  Whig political programme came to encompass not only the supremacy of parliament over the monarch and support  for <a title="Free trade" href="http://liberty-finder.com/free-trade">free  trade</a>, but Catholic emancipation, the abolition of <a title="Slavery" href="http://liberty-finder.com/slavery">slavery</a> and, significantly, expansion of the franchise (suffrage). <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 03/27/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/british-whig-party/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuban dissidents</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/cuban-dissidents</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/cuban-dissidents#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist dictatorchips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cuban democracy movement is a political movement in Cuba whose aim is &#8220;to replace the current regime with a more democratic form of government&#8221;. According to Human Rights Watch, the Cuban government represses nearly all forms of political dissent. (CC Wikipedia 03/28/2010)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Cuban democracy movement</strong> is a political movement in <a title="Cuba" href="http://liberty-finder.com/cuba">Cuba</a> whose aim  is &#8220;to replace the current regime with a more democratic form of  government&#8221;.  According to Human Rights Watch, the Cuban government represses nearly  all forms of political dissent. (CC Wikipedia 03/28/2010)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/cuban-dissidents/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuba</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/cuba</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/cuba#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist dictatorchips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republic of Cuba is an island country in the Caribbean. It consists of the island of Cuba, the Isla de la Juventud, and several archipelagos. Havana is the largest city in Cuba and the country&#8217;s capital. Cuba is home to over 11 million people and is the most populous insular nation in the Caribbean. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Republic of Cuba</strong><small></small> is an  island country in the Caribbean. It consists of the island of Cuba, the  Isla de la Juventud, and several archipelagos. Havana is  the largest city in Cuba and the country&#8217;s capital.<sup id="cite_ref-8"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba#cite_note-8"></a></sup></p>
<p>Cuba is home to over 11 million people and is the most populous insular nation in the Caribbean. Its people, culture, and customs draw from diverse sources, including the  aboriginal Taíno and Ciboney peoples; the period of Spanish colonialism; the introduction of African slaves;  and its proximity to the United  States.</p>
<p>The Castro&#8217;s government has been accused of numerous human rights abuses including torture,  arbitrary imprisonment, unfair trials, and extrajudicial executions  (a.k.a. <em>&#8220;El Paredón&#8221;</em>). The Human Rights Watch alleges that the  government &#8220;represses nearly all forms of political dissent&#8221; and that  &#8220;Cubans are systematically denied basic rights to free expression,  association, assembly, privacy, movement, and due process of law&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cuba was the second biggest prison in the world for journalists in  2008, second only to the People&#8217;s Republic of China, according to the Committee to Protect  Journalists (CPJ), an international NGO.<sup id="cite_ref-89"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba#cite_note-89"></a></sup> As a result of computer ownership bans, computer ownership rates  are among the world&#8217;s lowest. Right to use Internet is granted only to selected people and these  selected people are monitored. Connecting to the Internet illegally can lead to a five-year prison  sentence.</p>
<p><a title="Cuban  dissidents" href="http://liberty-finder.com/cuban-dissidents">Cuban dissidents</a> face arrests and  imprisonment. In the 1990s, Human Rights reported that Cuba&#8217;s extensive  prison system, one of the largest in Latin America, consists of some 40  maximum-security prisons, 30 minimum-security prisons, and over 200 work  camps. According to Human Rights Watch, political prisoners, along with the  rest of Cuba&#8217;s prison population, are confined to jails with substandard  and unhealthy conditions. Other dissident thinkers such as <a title="Yoani  Sánchez" href="http://liberty-finder.com/yoani_sanchez">Yoani Sánchez</a> are under tight surveillance.</p>
<p>Citizens cannot leave or return to Cuba without first obtaining  official permission, which is often denied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/cuba/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Law</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/common-law</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/common-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Common law is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals (also called case law), rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A &#8220;common law system&#8221; is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law, on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Common law</strong> is <a title="Law" href="http://liberty-finder.com/law">law</a> developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals (also called case law),  rather than through legislative statutes or executive branch action. A &#8220;common  law system&#8221; is a legal system that gives great precedential weight to common law, on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar facts differently  on different occasions. The body of precedent is called &#8220;common law&#8221; and it binds  future decisions. In cases where the parties disagree on what the law  is, an idealized common law court looks to past precedential decisions of relevant courts. If a similar dispute has been resolved in  the past, the court is bound to follow the reasoning used in the prior decision  (this principle is known as <em>stare  decisis</em>). If, however, the court finds that the current dispute  is fundamentally distinct from all previous cases (called a &#8220;matter of first impression&#8221;),  judges have the authority and duty to make law by creating precedent.<sup id="cite_ref-2"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law#cite_note-2"></a></sup> Thereafter, the new decision becomes precedent, and will bind future  courts.</p>
<p>In practice, common law systems are considerably more complicated  than the idealized system described above. The decisions of a court are  binding only in a particular jurisdiction,  and even within a given jurisdiction, some courts have more power than  others. For example, in most jurisdictions, decisions by appellate courts are binding on lower  courts in the same jurisdiction and on future decisions of the same  appellate court, but decisions of lower courts are only non-binding  persuasive authority. Interactions between common law, constitutional law, statutory  law and regulatory law also give  rise to considerable complexity. However <em>stare  decisis</em>, the principle that similar cases should be decided  according to consistent principled rules so that they will reach similar  results, lies at the heart of all common law systems. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 03/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/common-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
