<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberty-Finder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberty-finder.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberty-finder.com</link>
	<description>Magnify Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:49:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conservatism</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/conservatism</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/conservatism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmund Burke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatism is a political attitude that advocates institutions and traditional practices that have developed organically, thus emphasizing stability and continuity. The first established use of the term in a political context was by François-René de Chateaubriand in 1819, following the French Revolution. The term has since been used to describe a variety of politicians with a wide range of views.
In Western politics, the term conservatism [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Conservatism</strong> is a political attitude that advocates institutions and traditional practices that have developed organically, thus emphasizing stability and continuity. The first established use of the term in a political context was by <a title="François-René de Chateaubriand" href="http://liberty-finder.com/francois-rene-de-chateaubriand">François-René de Chateaubriand</a> in 1819, following the <a title="French Revolution" href="http://liberty-finder.com/french-revolution">French Revolution</a>. The term has since been used to describe a variety of politicians with a wide range of views.</p>
<p>In Western politics, the term <em>conservatism</em> often refers to the school of thought based on British politician <a title="Edmund Burke" href="http://liberty-finder.com/edmund-burke">Edmund Burke</a>&#8217;s criticism of the French Revolution. Though his legacy as a conservative is disputed, he wrote against the excesses of mob rule. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/conservatism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classical Liberalism</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/classical-liberalism</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/classical-liberalism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberal / Libertarian Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classical liberalism is a political ideology that developed in the 19th century in England, Western Europe, and the Americas. It is committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly, and free markets. Notable individuals who have contributed to classical liberalism include Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. There was a revival of interest in classical liberalism in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Classical liberalism</strong> is a political ideology that developed in the <a title="19th century" href="http://liberty-finder.com/tag/19th-century">19th century</a> in England, Western Europe, and the Americas. It is committed to the ideal of <a title="Limited government" href="http://liberty-finder.com/limited-government">limited government</a> and liberty of individuals including <a title="Freedom of religion" href="http://liberty-finder.com/freedom-of-religion">freedom of religion</a>, speech, press, and assembly, and <a title="Free markets" href="http://liberty-finder.com/free-market">free markets</a>. Notable individuals who have contributed to classical liberalism include <a title="Jean-Baptiste Say" href="http://liberty-finder.com/jean-baptiste-say">Jean-Baptiste Say</a>, <a title="Thomas Malthus" href="http://liberty-finder.com/thomas-malthus">Thomas Malthus</a>, and <a title="David Ricardo" href="http://liberty-finder.com/david-ricardo">David Ricardo</a>. There was a revival of interest in classical liberalism in the 20th century led by <a title="Friedrich Hayek" href="http://liberty-finder.com/friedrich-hayek">Friedrich Hayek</a>, <a title="Milton Friedman" href="http://liberty-finder.com/milton-friedman">Milton Friedman</a> and other economists.</p>
<p>The phrase <em>classical liberalism</em> is also sometimes used to refer to all forms of <a title="Liberalism" href="http://liberty-finder.com/liberalism">liberalism</a> before the <a title="20th century" href="http://liberty-finder.com/tag/20th-century">20th century</a>. And, after 1970, the phrase began to be used by <a title="Libertarians" href="http://liberty-finder.com/libertarian">libertarians</a> to describe their belief in the primacy of economic freedom and minimal government. It is sometimes difficult to tell which meaning is intended in a given source. <span style="color: #808080;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/classical-liberalism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charter of liberties</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/charter-of-liberties</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/charter-of-liberties#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13th Century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Charter of Liberties, also called the Coronation Charter, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his ascension to the throne in 1100. It sought to bind the King to certain laws regarding the treatment of church officials and nobles. It is considered a landmark document in English legal history and a forerunner of Magna Carta.
The document [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Charter of Liberties</strong>, also called the <strong>Coronation Charter</strong>, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his ascension to the throne in 1100. It sought to bind the King to certain laws regarding the treatment of church officials and nobles. It is considered a landmark document in English legal history and a forerunner of <a title="Magna Carta" href="http://liberty-finder.com/Magna-Carta">Magna Carta</a>.</p>
<p>The document addressed abuses of royal power by his predecessor, his brother William Rufus, as perceived by the nobility, specifically the over-taxation of the barons, the abuse of vacant sees, and the practices of simony and <a title="Benefice" href="http://liberty-finder.com/pluralism">pluralism</a>.</p>
<p>The charter of liberties was generally ignored by monarchs until in 1213 Archbishop Langton reminded the nobles that their liberties had been guaranteed over a century prior in Henry I&#8217;s Charter of Liberties. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/charter-of-liberties/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/capitalism</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/capitalism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economical Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Capitalism is an economic and social system in which capital and land, the non-labor factors of production (also known as the means of production), are privately owned; labor, goods and resources are traded in markets; and profit, after taxes, is distributed to the owners or invested in technologies and industries.
There is no consensus on the definition of capitalism, nor how it should be used as an analytical category. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Capitalism</strong> is an economic and social system in which <a title="Capital (economics)" href="http://liberty-finder.com/capital">capital</a> and land, the non-labor factors of production (also known as the means of production), are privately owned; labor, goods and resources are traded in <a title="Market" href="http://liberty-finder.com/market">markets</a>; and profit, after taxes, is distributed to the owners or invested in technologies and industries.</p>
<p>There is no consensus on the definition of capitalism, nor how it should be used as an analytical category. There are a variety of historical cases over which it is applied, varying in time, geography, politics and culture. Economists, political economists and historians have taken different perspectives on the analysis of capitalism. Scholars in the social sciences, including historians, economic sociologists, economists, anthropologists and philosophers have debated over how to define capitalism, however there is little controversy that private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit in a market, and prices and wages are elements of capitalism.</p>
<p>Economists usually put emphasis on the <a title="Market" href="http://liberty-finder.com/market">market</a> medievalism, degree of government does not have control over markets (<a title="Laissez faire" href="http://liberty-finder.com/laissez-faire">laissez faire</a>), and <a title="Property" href="http://liberty-finder.com/property">property</a> rights, while most political economists emphasize private property, power relations, wage labor, and class.<span style="font-size: small;"><span> </span></span>There is a general agreement that capitalism encourages economic growth. The extent to which different markets are &#8220;free&#8221;, as well as the rules determining what may and may not be private property, is a matter of politics and policy and many states have what are termed &#8220;mixed economies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Capitalism as a system developed incrementally from the 16th century in Europe, although capitalist-like organizations existed in the ancient world, and early aspects of merchant capitalism flourished during the Late Middle Ages. Capitalism became dominant in the Western world following the demise of feudalism. Capitalism gradually spread throughout Europe, and in the 19th and 20th centuries, it provided the main means of <a title="Industrialization" href="http://liberty-finder.com/industrialization">industrialization</a> throughout much of the world. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/capitalism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill of rights</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/bill-of-rights</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/bill-of-rights#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill of rights is a list of the rights that are considered important and essential by a nation. The purpose of these bills is to protect those rights against infringement by the government. The term &#8220;bill of rights&#8221; originates from Great Britain, where it referred to a bill that was passed by Parliament in 1689.
An entrenched bill of rights exists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <strong>bill of rights</strong> is a list of the rights that are considered important and essential by a <a title="Nation" href="http://liberty-finder.com/nation">nation</a>. The purpose of these bills is to protect those rights against infringement by the government. The term &#8220;bill of rights&#8221; originates from Great Britain, where it referred to a bill that was passed by <a title="Parliament" href="http://liberty-finder.com/parliament">Parliament</a> in 1689.</p>
<p>An entrenched bill of rights exists as a separate instrument that falls outside of the normal jurisdiction of a country&#8217;s legislative body. In many governments, an official legal bill of rights recognized in principle holds more authority than the legislative bodies alone. A bill of rights, on the other hand, may be weakened by subsequent acts passed by government, and they do not need an approval by vote to alter it.</p>
<p>An unentrenched bill of rights exists as a separate act that is presented by a legislative body. As such it can be changed or repealed by the body that created it. It is not as permanent as a <em>constitutional</em>bill of rights.</p>
<p>In other jurisdictions, the definition of rights may be statutory. In other words, it may be repealed just like any other law, and does not necessarily have greater weight than other laws. Not every jurisdiction enforces the protection of the rights articulated in its bill of rights.</p>
<p>Australia is the only Western country with neither a constitutional nor legislative bill of rights, although there is ongoing debate in many of Australia&#8217;s states. Former Australian Prime Minister John Howardhas argued against a bills of rights for Australia as transferring power from elected politicians to unelected judges and bureaucrats. Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) are the only regions of the nation&#8217;s states to have a human rights bill. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/bill-of-rights/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/declaration-of-the-rights-of-man-and-of-the-citizen</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/declaration-of-the-rights-of-man-and-of-the-citizen#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen is a fundamental document of the French Revolution, defining the individual and collective rights of all the estates of the realm as universal. Influenced by the doctrine of natural rights, the rights of Man are universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself. Although [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em><strong>Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen</strong></em> is a fundamental document of the <a title="French Revolution" href="http://liberty-finder.com/French-Revolution">French Revolution</a>, defining the individual and collective rights of all the estates of the realm as universal. Influenced by the doctrine of natural rights, the rights of Man are universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself. Although it establishes fundamental rights for French citizens and <em>all men without exception</em>, it addresses neither the status of women nor slavery; despite that, it is a precursor document to international human rights instruments. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 02/28/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/declaration-of-the-rights-of-man-and-of-the-citizen/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French Revolution</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/french-revolution</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/french-revolution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French Revolution (1789–1799) was a period of radical social and political upheaval in French and European history. The absolute monarchy that had ruled France for centuries collapsed in three years. French society underwent an epic transformation as feudal, aristocratic, and religious privileges evaporated under a sustained assault from liberal political groups and the masses on the streets. Old ideas about hierarchy and tradition succumbed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>French Revolution</strong> (1789–1799) was a period of radical social and political upheaval in French and European history. The absolute monarchy that had ruled France for centuries collapsed in three years. French society underwent an epic transformation as feudal, aristocratic, and religious privileges evaporated under a sustained assault from <a title="Liberalism" href="http://liberty-finder.com/liberalism">liberal</a> political groups and the masses on the streets. Old ideas about hierarchy and tradition succumbed to new Enlightenment principles of citizenship and <a title="Inalienable rights" href="http://liberty-finder.com/inalienable-rights">inalienable rights</a>.</p>
<p>The French Revolution began in 1789 with the convocation of the Estates-General in May. The first year of the Revolution witnessed members of the Third Estate proclaiming the Tennis Court Oath in June, the assault on the Bastille in July, the passage of the <a title="Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen" href="http://liberty-finder.com/Declaration-of-the-Rights-of-Man-and-of-the-Citizen">Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen</a> in August, and an epic march on Versailles that forced the royal court back to <a title="Paris" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris">Paris</a> in October. The next few years were dominated by tensions between a liberal legislature and a conservative monarchy intent on thwarting major reforms. The liberals proclaimed a <a title="First French Republic" href="http://liberty-finder.com/republic">republic</a> in September 1792 and the king was executed the next year. External threats also played a dominant role in the development of the Revolution. The French Revolutionary Wars started in 1792 and ultimately featured spectacular French victories that facilitated the conquest of the Italian peninsula, the Low Countries, and most territories west of the Rhine—achievements that had defied previous French governments for centuries. Internally, popular sentiments radicalized the Revolution significantly, culminating in the brutal Reign of Terror from 1793 until 1794. After the fall of Robespierre and the Jacobins, the Directory assumed control of the French state in 1795 and held power until 1799, when it was replaced by the Consulate under Napoleon Bonaparte.</p>
<p>The modern era has unfolded in the shadow of the French Revolution. The growth of republics and <a title="Liberal democracy" href="http://liberty-finder.com/liberal-democracy">liberal democracies</a>, the spread of secularism, the development of modern ideologies, and the invention of total war all mark their birth during the Revolution. Subsequent events that can be traced to the Revolution include the Napoleonic Wars, two separate restorations of the monarchy, and two additional revolutions as modern France took shape. In the following century, France would be governed at one point or another as a <a title="Republic" href="http://liberty-finder.com/republic">republic</a>, <a title="Constitutional monarchy" href="http://liberty-finder.com/constitutional-monarchy">constitutional monarchy</a>, and two different empires. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/19/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/french-revolution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montesquieu</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/montesquieu</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/montesquieu#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu (1689 - 1755), was a French social commentator and political thinker who lived during the Era of the Enlightenment. He is famous for his articulation of the theory of separation of powers, taken for granted in modern discussions of government and implemented in many constitutions throughout the world. He was largely responsible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu</strong> (1689 - 1755), was a French social commentator and political thinker who lived during the Era of the Enlightenment. He is famous for his articulation of the theory of <a title="Separation of powers" href="http://liberty-finder.com/separation-of-powers">separation of powers</a>, taken for granted in modern discussions of <a title="Government" href="http://liberty-finder.com/government">government</a> and implemented in many <a title="Constitution" href="http://liberty-finder.com/constitution">constitutions</a> throughout the world. He was largely responsible for the popularization of the terms feudalism and Byzantine Empire. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/19/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/montesquieu/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/freedom</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/freedom#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophical Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freedom is the human value, or situation, to act according to one&#8217;s will without being held up by the power of others. (CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/19/2010)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Freedom </strong>is the human value, or situation, to act according to one&#8217;s will without being held up by the power of others. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/19/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/freedom/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free trade</title>
		<link>http://liberty-finder.com/free-trade</link>
		<comments>http://liberty-finder.com/free-trade#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economical Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free trade is a system of trade policy that allows traders to act and transact without interference from government. According to the law of comparative advantage the policy permits trading partners mutual gains from trade of goods and services.
Under a free trade policy, prices are a reflection of true supply and demand, and are the sole determinant of resource allocation. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free trade</strong> is a system of trade policy that allows traders to act and transact without interference from government. According to the law of comparative advantage the policy permits trading partners mutual gains from trade of goods and services.</p>
<p>Under a free trade policy, prices are a reflection of true <a title="Supply and demand" href="http://liberty-finder.com/supply-and-demand">supply and demand</a>, and are the sole determinant of resource allocation. Free trade differs from other forms of trade policy where the allocation of goods and services amongst trading countries are determined by artificial prices that may or may not reflect the true nature of supply and demand. These artificial prices are the result of <a title="Protectionist" href="http://liberty-finder.com/protectionism">protectionist</a> trade policies, whereby governments intervene in the market through price adjustments and supply restrictions. Such government interventions can increase as well as decrease the cost of goods and services to both consumers and producers.</p>
<p>Interventions include subsidies, <a title="Taxes" href="http://liberty-finder.com/tax">taxes</a> and tariffs, non-tariff barriers, such as regulatory legislation and quotas, and even inter-government managed trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) (contrary to their formal titles) and any governmental market intervention resulting in artificial prices.</p>
<p>Most states conduct trade polices that are to a lesser or greater degree protectionist. One ubiquitous protectionist policy employed by states comes in the form of agricultural subsidies whereby countries attempt to protect their agricultural industries from outside competition by creating artificial low prices for their agricultural goods.</p>
<p>Free trade agreements are a key element of customs unions and free trade areas. The details and differences of these agreements are covered in their respective articles. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 02/21/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liberty-finder.com/free-trade/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
